Cal EPA Asserts Shockingly Broad Area Over Non-public Property


Gov. Gavin Newsom and Secretary for Environmental Safety Jared Blumenfeld, Oct 22, 2013, in San Francisco. (Photograph: Steve Rhodes)

Legend has it that Jed Clampett “was shootin’ at some meals / When up by the bottom come a bubblin’ crude.”

The Beverly Hillbillies’ transformation into prompt millionaires illustrates one of many oldest conceptions within the western world: What’s in your land belongs to you. This concept predates the founding of America. If you happen to discover gold in your yard, that useful resource belongs to you.

California desires to alter that.

A supply close to San Diego has shared with California Globe a stunning letter that’s quietly being delivered to homeowners of personal wells.

“California is marching towards a world the place these with wells on their very own property shall be required to place a meter on them and pay the federal government,” writes the supply. “As a result of of their world, the federal government owns all the pieces and we’re simply renters.”

Jared Blumenfeld, Secretary for Environmental Safety. (Photograph: California Division of Environmental Safety)

The letter is signed by Natalie Stork, the Chief of Groundwater Administration Program Unit 1, and was despatched in late July on the letterhead of California Water Boards, beneath the authority of Gov. Newsom and Jared Blumenfeld, Secretary for Environmental Safety. Buried beneath the bureaucratic acronyms GSA and SGMA (Groundwater Sustainability Company and Sustainable Groundwater Administration Act) is a particularly aggressive conception of presidency authority and its dominion over non-public property.

The letter reads, “Landowners whose property is inside an unmanaged space and comprises an working floor water extraction effectively should report the amount of groundwater extracted from the effectively. The groundwater extraction quantity should be reported as a month-to-month whole. Along with pumping volumes, reviews should embody the situation of the effectively and the place and function of use of the groundwater. Groundwater extraction reviews usually are not as a result of state water board till February 1, 2023. Nonetheless, if you’re required to report, the report should embody pumping volumes for every month between the date of receipt of this letter and September 30, 2022.”

This isn’t merely a bureaucratic problem. There are charges, in fact. The bottom submitting charge is $300 per effectively, which all extractors are required to report. Then there’s a further charge of $10 per acre foot with a meter, $25 per acre foot with out. Tardy filers face a late charge of 25% per thirty days.

California Globe reached out to Ms. Stork and SGMA to inquire how extensively this letter was despatched and the place the State Water Sources Management Board derives the fitting to cost effectively homeowners for water on their very own property. This story shall be up to date to incorporate her remark if both responds.

In the meantime, the ramifications for property rights are monumental.

“They’re sending out letters to property homeowners saying they need to declare [if] they use simply two acre ft,” observes the supply who acquired the letter. “In the event that they use extra they need to pay an annual charge of $300 for every effectively plus they need to meter the water and ship in a month-to-month utilization report and pay a charge for water that’s pumped beginning in Feb 2023. What an ideal racket! The federal government supplies no service, no help, no product, doesn’t even do the billing! That’s all on residents. All [the government does] is money the test.”

In accordance with two individuals who acquired the letter, to date no organized resistance to this non-public property seize has but emerged. However a minimum of one supply expects the small charges to develop, which can absolutely result in pushback from residents.

“The charges could appear small right this moment, however they at all times begin small. Then they’ll ratchet up. Equally, whereas this excludes mild home customers, it gained’t for lengthy.”

Under is a duplicate of the letter, with probably figuring out parts redacted to keep away from the recipient being focused by authorities authorities who clearly know no bounds.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



Supply hyperlink